Moving infrastructure to a third-party data center is a long-term commitment. Contracts run for years, and relocating servers, data, and network connections later is slow and expensive. Choosing the wrong data center shows up as latency for users, unplanned power outages, and audit findings that are hard to fix after the move.
A structured evaluation reduces this risk. Comparing facilities against documented requirements and verifying each provider's claims through documents and site visits turns a sales-driven decision into an informed one.
This guide explains how to evaluate data center providers, which criteria and certifications to compare, and what to ask before signing a contract.

Why Data Center Selection Matters
The hosting facility sets physical limits that neither software nor staff can fully offset. Network distance, power design, and physical security are fixed properties of the building, and they apply to every workload placed there. The decision affects the following areas:
- Performance. Distance between the facility and its users adds network latency to every request. Real-time applications and systems that exchange data frequently feel the delay first.
- Availability. The facility's power and cooling design determines how much uptime workloads keep during equipment failures and maintenance. A weak design turns routine faults into outages.
- Security and compliance. Physical access controls and audited processes protect the hardware and the data on it. A gap at the facility level becomes the customer's problem during a data breach or an audit.
- Cost. Pricing models, metered extras, and contract terms decide the actual monthly bill. A facility with a low base price often costs more once power, bandwidth, and support charges are added.
- Flexibility. Long contracts and physical hardware make switching providers slow. A wrong choice leads to vendor lock-in or a forced data center migration.
Switching providers later is possible, but it is slow and disruptive. Most of the risk must be addressed before the contract is signed.
Key Criteria for Data Center Selection
Every evaluation should start with the server workloads that will run in the facility. Document their capacity needs, latency targets, and regulatory obligations before contacting providers, along with the expected growth over the contract term. These requirements then act as a filter, so the evaluation covers only the facility features relevant to the organization.
Location and Latency
A facility's location affects both performance and risk. Shorter distances to end users and connected systems mean lower latency, which matters most for interactive applications and real-time data processing. Proximity to the organization's offices also matters if staff need to visit for installations or repairs. A facility two hours away turns a quick repair into a half-day trip every time hardware fails.
Location also decides which laws apply to stored data. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and similar laws restrict where personal data is stored and how it is transferred across borders. Data residency requirements narrow the list of acceptable regions before any other factor is compared.
Organizations building their own facility also weigh land, utility access, and tax incentives during data center site selection.
Power and Cooling Infrastructure
Power and cooling determine how much equipment a facility can host and how reliably it runs. Total capacity is only part of the picture. Per-rack limits, utility feeds, and backup systems decide whether the facility supports current hardware and the next refresh. Key infrastructure elements to evaluate include:
- Utility feeds. Utility feeds are the incoming power lines that connect the facility to the electrical grid. Feeds from more than one substation reduce exposure to a single grid failure, so ask whether the facility has them.
- Backup power. Uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems carry the load until on-site generators start. Check fuel storage capacity and refueling contracts for extended outages.
- Power density. The maximum power per rack, known as rack density, limits how much hardware fits in one cabinet. Verify that the limit covers the densest planned hardware.
- Cooling capacity. Standard cooling systems handle typical densities, while high-density racks increasingly need liquid cooling. Ask which cooling methods the facility supports at those densities.
- Fire suppression. Gas-based and pre-action sprinkler systems protect equipment without flooding the data hall. Confirm that environmental monitoring covers heat, humidity, and water leaks.
Power density deserves extra attention. GPU computing and other AI data center workloads draw far more power per rack than general-purpose servers. Plan for the hardware that will run in three to five years, not only today.
Redundancy and Uptime
Redundancy describes the spare components and independent paths a facility has for power and cooling. Higher redundancy supports high availability by lowering the chance that a single failure or planned maintenance takes workloads offline. It also raises the cost. Facilities describe their redundancy with the following models:
- N. The facility has exactly the capacity the load requires, so every component is a single point of failure.
- N+1. The facility has one component beyond the required capacity, so a single unit can fail or go offline for service.
- 2N. The facility runs two fully independent systems, each able to carry the entire load alone.
- 2N+1. The facility runs two independent systems plus one extra component for additional protection.
Redundancy shows what the facility is built to withstand, while the service level agreement (SLA) defines what the provider commits to. Check the uptime guarantees for power and network separately, how the provider measures downtime, and which credits apply when it misses the target. Credits rarely cover the business cost of an outage, so treat the SLA as a measure of the provider's confidence, not as insurance.

Physical and Network Security
Physical data center security works in layers. Each layer narrows who can get closer to the equipment and records who does. A well-protected facility includes the following layers:
- Perimeter. Fencing, vehicle barriers, and on-site guards control who reaches the building.
- Building entry. Mantraps and badge readers combined with multi-factor authentication (MFA) admit one verified person at a time.
- Data hall. Video surveillance and access logs track every entry to the server floor.
- Cage and rack. Locked cages and cabinets limit customers to their own equipment.
The network layer needs the same scrutiny. Check whether the provider offers distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) mitigation, firewalls, and 24/7 monitoring from a network operations center (NOC), and which of these services cost extra. Most providers describe their facilities as secure, so rely on a site visit and audit reports instead of sales materials.

Connectivity and Carrier Neutrality
A carrier-neutral data center gives customers a choice of network providers instead of tying them to one. Multiple carriers improve resilience, since traffic reroutes when one network fails, and competition between carriers keeps bandwidth prices in check.
Beyond the number of carriers, check for access to internet exchange (IX) points and direct connections to public cloud providers. These connections support hybrid cloud and multi-cloud setups without routing traffic over the public internet. Also ask whether fiber enters the building through physically separate paths, so a single cable cut doesn't isolate the facility.
Scalability and Capacity
Infrastructure needs rarely stay flat. A facility that fits today's footprint can run out of power or space before the contract ends. Evaluate scalability on three levels: available space and power in the current building, the provider's expansion plans, and how quickly additional capacity is delivered.
Scaling down matters as well. Contracts that lock in a fixed amount of space or power make it expensive to shrink after a workload moves elsewhere. Look for terms that allow adjustments without renegotiating the entire agreement.
Natural and Man-Made Risks
Even a well-designed facility is exposed to its surroundings. Check the region's history of floods, earthquakes, and severe storms, and ask how the building is protected against the ones that apply.
Man-made risks are just as important. Nearby airports, rail lines, and highways raise the chance of accidents that disrupt operations. A building shared with unrelated tenants adds risks such as fire or water damage spreading from neighboring offices.
A disaster recovery plan must still assume the facility can fail. Ask whether the provider supports failover to a second site and whether it offers backups or replication between its locations.
Support and Service Levels
Hardware fails at unpredictable times, so support availability matters as much as the building itself. Confirm that technical staff are on site 24/7/365 and check the guaranteed response times for each issue severity.
Most providers offer remote hands, a service in which on-site technicians perform physical tasks on the customer's behalf. Typical tasks include rebooting servers, replacing drives, and checking cable connections. Clarify which tasks the contract includes and which are billed per hour or per incident. These charges add up quickly where hardware work is frequent.
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency has become a selection factor in its own right. Many organizations count their hosting provider's emissions toward their own environmental targets, and some regions, including the EU, require data centers to report energy performance.
Power usage effectiveness (PUE) is the most common efficiency metric. It divides the total energy a facility uses by the energy delivered to IT equipment. A lower value means less energy goes to cooling and power conversion, and 1.0 is the theoretical ideal.
Ask providers for measured rather than design PUE values, along with water usage effectiveness (WUE) and the share of renewable energy in their supply. Efficient cooling and power design drive both lower operating costs and data center sustainability.
Cost and Contract Terms
Base prices rarely reflect the full cost of a data center contract. The total depends on what the provider meters separately, such as power, bandwidth, and every cross-connect, and on how the contract handles changes. Compare the following cost elements across providers:
- Power. Some providers bundle power into the space price, while others bill actual consumption or committed capacity.
- Bandwidth. Pricing ranges from flat-rate ports to committed rates with overage fees.
- Cross-connects. Each physical connection to a carrier or cloud provider usually carries a one-time fee and a monthly fee.
- Setup fees. Installation and onboarding charges apply at the start and sometimes again with each expansion.
Review the contract terms as closely as the pricing. Check the contract length, renewal price increases, and early termination fees. Confirm the exit terms as well, including how data and hardware leave the facility and what support the provider offers during a migration.
Provider Reputation and Stability
Data center reliability depends on the company running the facility as much as on the building itself. Ask for references from customers of a similar industry and size, and look for public records of past outages and how the provider communicated during them. How a provider handled past incidents is a better guide than its marketing materials.
Financial stability matters for long contracts. A provider that changes ownership or closes a site forces an unplanned migration. Check how long the company has operated, who owns it, and whether it owns or leases the building.
Types of Data Centers to Consider
Not every option requires choosing a building and signing a space contract. The type of facility decides how much of the infrastructure the organization owns, manages, and maintains, so the criteria above apply differently to each one. The main data center types include:
- Enterprise data centers. An enterprise data center is built and operated by the organization it serves. It offers full control but requires capital investment and in-house staff.
- Colocation data centers. These facilities rent space, power, and connectivity to customers who install and maintain their own hardware.
- Managed hosting. Managed hosting providers own and maintain the hardware, such as dedicated servers, while customers manage the software running on it.
- Hyperscale data centers. Hyperscale facilities deliver cloud computing services at massive scale. Customers use virtualized resources and never access the physical hardware.
- Edge data centers. Edge data centers are small facilities placed close to end users or data sources to support edge computing and low-latency processing. They typically house compact edge servers rather than full server halls.
Many organizations combine on-premises and cloud infrastructure, keeping sensitive data in-house and using cloud services for variable demand. In that case, apply the selection criteria to each facility separately.
Data Center Certifications and Standards to Consider
Certifications and audit reports provide independent proof that a facility meets the standards it advertises. They also let customers show their own auditors that infrastructure they don't operate is still under control. Which ones are mandatory depends on the industry and the type of data hosted, as data center compliance rules differ widely between sectors.
Uptime Institute Tier Ratings
The Uptime Institute classifies data center tiers by the resilience of a facility's infrastructure design. Each level builds on the one below it and adds protection against a wider range of failures. The four levels are:
- Tier I. A Tier I facility provides basic capacity with no redundant components.
- Tier II. A Tier II facility adds redundant capacity components but keeps a single distribution path.
- Tier III. A Tier III facility is concurrently maintainable, so any component can be serviced without shutting down IT equipment.
- Tier IV. A Tier IV facility is fault tolerant and keeps running through any single unplanned failure.
Tiers describe a facility's design, not a guaranteed uptime percentage. Uptime commitments belong in the SLA. Only the Uptime Institute certifies tiers, so labels such as "Tier III design" reflect a provider's own assessment rather than a certification.
SOC 2 and ISO Certifications
System and Organization Controls (SOC) reports are independent audits of a provider's controls, defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Strictly speaking, they are attestation reports rather than certifications. The three report types serve different readers:
- SOC 1. A SOC 1 report covers controls relevant to customers' financial reporting.
- SOC 2. A SOC 2 report evaluates controls against the AICPA Trust Services Criteria, with security as the mandatory category.
- SOC 3. A SOC 3 report is a public summary of a SOC 2 audit, without the confidential details.
Request a SOC 2 Type II report, which tests how controls operate over several months. A Type I report only confirms their design at a single point in time.
ISO/IEC 27001 is the international standard for information security management, and its current version is ISO/IEC 27001:2022. ISO 22301 (business continuity) and ISO 50001 (energy management) are also relevant for data centers. Check that each certificate's scope covers the specific facility, not only the provider's headquarters.
Industry-Specific Compliance
Some workloads carry legal or contractual requirements that extend to the hosting facility. A provider can't make a customer compliant, but it should operate the infrastructure layer in line with the rules and document its share of the responsibility. Common frameworks include:
- HIPAA. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act governs protected health information in the U.S. Providers that store or process this data must sign a business associate agreement (BAA), and many healthcare organizations also look for HITRUST certification.
- PCI DSS. The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard applies to every environment that stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data. The PCI Security Standards Council maintains the standard, and its current version is PCI DSS v4.0.1.
- GDPR. The regulation governs the personal data of residents in the European Economic Area (EU plus Norway, Liechtenstein, and Iceland). It requires a data processing agreement with any provider that handles that data.
- FedRAMP and GovRAMP. The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) authorizes cloud services for U.S. federal agencies. GovRAMP, formerly StateRAMP, does the same for state and local governments.
- DORA and NIS2. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) applies to EU financial entities, while the NIS2 Directive covers organizations in critical sectors. Both require oversight of critical third-party technology providers.
Responsibility is shared under every framework. Ask each provider for a responsibility matrix, a document that lists which controls the provider handles and which remain with the customer.
On-Site Maintenance vs. Remote Management
Choosing a facility also means choosing who maintains the hardware inside it. With on-site maintenance, the organization owns the servers, and its own technicians handle installation, repairs, and hardware refreshes in person. With remote management, the provider owns and maintains the hardware, while the customer manages it through a web portal or application programming interface (API).
On-site maintenance gives full control over hardware choices and configurations. The trade-offs are travel time, a spare-parts inventory, and engineers who must be available whenever a component fails. Remote hands services reduce the number of site visits, but technicians handle requests in the order they arrive, and tasks outside the contract are billed separately.
Remote management, a form of data center outsourcing, removes that physical work. The provider's technicians replace failed hardware components, refreshes happen without capital purchases, and server provisioning often takes minutes instead of weeks. In exchange, the organization accepts less control over exact hardware models and a closer dependence on the provider's support quality.
Remote management suits organizations that lack engineers near the facility or prefer to focus their staff on software rather than hardware.
Note: phoenixNAP's Bare Metal Cloud provides a dedicated server with the flexibility of the cloud, giving organizations data center infrastructure on demand. phoenixNAP maintains the hardware and the facilities, while customers deploy and manage single-tenant servers in minutes through the web portal, command-line interface (CLI), or API.

Common Data Center Selection Mistakes to Avoid
Most selection problems trace back to the evaluation process rather than the facilities themselves. Under deadline or budget pressure, buyers skip verification steps that would have exposed an issue. The most common mistakes include:
- Choosing on price alone. The lowest base rate often hides metered power, bandwidth overages, and expensive support. Compare total cost over the full contract term.
- Trusting self-reported ratings. A "Tier III design" or "compliant" label is not a certification. Ask for the certificate or audit report itself.
- Planning only for current density. Hardware refreshes, especially for AI workloads, raise power per rack. As rack density keeps increasing, a facility at its limit today blocks the next upgrade.
- Skipping the site visit. Photos and virtual tours show only what the provider chooses to show. An in-person visit reveals housekeeping, security discipline, and how staff follow procedures.
- Ignoring exit terms. Termination fees and slow decommissioning make leaving expensive. Negotiate exit and migration support before signing, not during a dispute.
- Overlooking SLA details. Uptime guarantees with narrow definitions and small credits offer little protection. Read how downtime is measured and what is excluded.
- Leaving out key stakeholders. Network, security, and finance staff each spot different risks. Involve them before the shortlist is final.
Each of these mistakes costs little to avoid during the evaluation and a great deal to fix after the move.
Data Center Selection Checklist
A consistent process makes providers comparable and keeps the decision documented for later audits. Without a fixed sequence, each provider is judged on different terms, and the final choice rests on the strongest sales pitch. The following steps take an evaluation from requirements to a signed contract:
- Define requirements. Document latency, compliance, and budget needs for every workload, and use capacity planning to estimate future growth.
- Build a shortlist. Filter data center providers by location, available capacity, and required certifications.
- Request documentation. Collect SLAs, audit reports, certificates, and pricing through a standardized request for proposal (RFP), so responses are comparable.
- Visit the facility. Tour the data hall, check security procedures in person, and meet the operations staff.
- Compare total cost. Model costs over the full contract term, including metered extras and expected growth.
- Review the contract. Check SLA terms, renewal conditions, and exit provisions with the legal and procurement departments.
Score every provider against the same requirements in one shared document, so all stakeholders review the same comparison.

Questions to Ask Potential Providers
Standardized questions make provider responses comparable and reveal gaps that sales materials leave out. Request supporting documents wherever possible. Key questions to ask when looking for a data center provider include:
- What is the maximum power per rack, and is liquid cooling available?
- Which redundancy model covers power and cooling?
- How is power usage monitored and reported to customers?
- What uptime does the SLA guarantee, and how is downtime measured?
- When was the last significant outage, and what changed afterward?
- Can the provider share a current SOC 2 Type II report and ISO 27001 certificate?
- Which Uptime Institute certification does the facility hold, and for which stage?
- Is a responsibility matrix available for HIPAA or PCI DSS controls?
- Are engineers on site 24/7, and what are the response times by severity?
- Which remote-hands tasks does the price include?
- Which services are metered separately?
- What are the renewal, termination, and exit terms?
A vague answer or a report that never arrives is an answer in itself. A provider confident in its facility shares documentation without hesitation.
Data Center Selection FAQ
Organizations comparing data center providers tend to raise similar questions about priorities, ratings, and security. The short answers below address the most common ones and help when explaining the decision to stakeholders who weren't part of the evaluation.
What Is the Most Important Factor in Data Center Selection?
No single factor applies to every organization. Workload requirements decide which criteria carry the most weight: latency-sensitive applications prioritize location, regulated data prioritizes compliance, and high-density hardware prioritizes power and cooling.
What Are Data Center Tiers and Why Do They Matter?
Data center tiers are the Uptime Institute's four-level classification of a facility's power and cooling resilience, from Tier I (basic capacity) to Tier IV (fault tolerant). They matter because they show how well a facility handles maintenance and equipment failures. Only certification by the Uptime Institute confirms a tier rating.
How to Evaluate the Security of a Data Center?
Evaluate security through evidence rather than sales claims. Request the provider's current SOC 2 Type II report and ISO 27001 certificate. Tour the facility to see access controls in person and ask how incidents are detected and reported to customers.
Base Data Center Selection on Verified Evidence
The choice of data center outlasts most of the hardware placed inside the facility. Providers that look similar on paper differ in power density, contract terms, and how well their claims hold up under scrutiny. Start by documenting workload requirements, then put every shortlisted provider through the same questions and documents before signing.